quinta-feira, 9 de dezembro de 2010

"GROUND ZERO MOSQUE"



The facts that occurred on September 11 took everyone by surprise. The world was surprised, shocked and horrified at what happened and obviously the most shocked ones were the Americans. So it is natural that in months following the attack many people developed a sort of revolt, anger and fear towards all Muslims, as they identified them all with terrorists, which is tremendously unfair.

What happened on that day influenced the way many Muslims lived afterwards. There are news of Muslim taxi drivers who stopped working at night because they feared that some extremists Americans might attack them, and punish them for what terrorists had done. Many Muslim kids were insulted in their schools, some teachers were dismissed from their posts and many other workers had to face some sort of discrimination at work. But as time went by the situation started to soften and life seemed to slowly come back to its track.....until the news came of the construction of a Mosque in Ground Zero!

When faced with the news Americans took sides: same were in favour and others against that project. This is not surprising!

The surprising thing is that at a certain point news was biased and the population was not correctly informed about the project. As we know politicians and the Media live or survive thanks the news.

In this case it became obvious that some politicians who had almost disappeared from the news world, such as Sarah Palin, took advantage of the situation and started making statements that were like gas thrown to fire and some people, who were not so well informed, immediately started to demonstrate against the so called Ground Zero Mosque.

The fact is that it is not a Mosque! It is a community centre which will be open to the public and that includes: a theatre, a basketball court, a swimming pool, a childcare area, an art studio, a performing arts centre, a 500-seat auditorium, a fitness centre, a bookstore, a culinary school, a food court, a memorial to the victims of the September 11 attacks and prayer space. This prayer space, which will accommodate 1000 to 2000 people, is the basis of all controversy.

The people who are in favour of the building of the community centre and its Mosque say that America was founded on the basis of freedom. Freedom of expression, freedom to choose any political party or religion, therefore fighting against this project means to fight the basic ideals of the country. Besides, the Human Rights also state that everyone is free to have his/her religious option and live peacefully with it anywhere in the world and should not be discriminated against because of it.

They even say it is hypocritical to deny or refuse the project because in the area of the Ground Zero is a restaurant run by a Muslim and nobody told him to leave. Of course people can say that a restaurant is not the same as a Mosque, but if the problem is possibility of reunions or meetings among Muslims, who might conspire against the USA, then it is obvious that these meetings can be held anywhere and a restaurant could be a great disguise, couldn’t it?

Another argument of the people in favour of the project is that Community centre is not to be built in the Ground Zero! That´s just bad news! The idea is to build it in an old factory, not far from the Ground Zero Mosque, but it is not in the Ground Zero!

However there are lots of people who are against this project.

They say that families and friends of those who were killed by the terrorist attack may feel offended as it is reminder of what happened to their loved ones. They ever say that a Muslim building in that area is kind of trophy the Islamises are holding enjoy to show their pride and power. The families of the victims of the attack say that the issue is not about freedom of religion; no, it´s about being sensitive and compassionate and no one should impose something that beings back such painful memories as most of them are still trying to overcome the trauma caused by their loss under such tragic circumstances.

Some also refer that it may be seen a sort of silent acceptance that the Americans can do nothing against the terrorists, cannot stop their acts against democracy. They fear that the Mosque may be a sort of recruitment centre of radical Islamists.

To sum up, I´d say there are lots of arguments in favour and lots of arguments against.

My perspective is that all of them should be taken into account, having in mind that we are dealing with people and feelings. If you ask me, I´d say don´t build the centre in that area, not because of anything else but the compassion towards those who might feel hurt by it.

In an ideal world these things would have never happened and if they did people would be “spiritual” enough to forgive and forget, but the truth is that our world is not an ideal one, yet!

domingo, 29 de março de 2009

Why was the Elizabethan era such an important period in British history?



Poetry:

   The Elizabethan period (1558 to 1603) in poetry is characterized by a number of frequently overlapping developments. The introduction and adaptation of themes, models and verse forms from other European traditions and classical literature, the Elizabethan song tradition, the emergence of a courtly poetry often centred around the figure of the monarch and the growth of a verse-based drama are among the most important of these developments.A wide range of Elizabethan poets wrote songs, including Nicholas Grimald, Thomas Nashe and Robert Southwell. There are also a large number of extant anonymous songs from the period. Perhaps the greatest of all the songwriters was Thomas Campion. Campion is also notable because of his experiments with metres based on counting syllables rather than stresses. These quantitative metres were based on classical models and should be viewed as part of the wider Renaissance revival of Greek and Roman artistic methods.
   The songs were generally printed either in miscellanies or anthologies such as Richard Tottel's 1557 Songs and Sonnets or in songbooks that included printed music to enable performance. These performances formed an integral part of both public and private entertainment. By the end of the 16th century, a new generation of composers, including John Dowland, William Byrd, Orlando Gibbons, Thomas Weelkes and Thomas Morley were helping to bring the art of Elizabethan song to an extremely high musical level.
With the consolidation of Elizabeth's power, a genuine court sympathetic to poetry and the arts in general emerged. This encouraged the emergence of a poetry aimed at, and often set in, an idealised version of the courtly world.
   Among the best known examples of this are Edmund Spenser's The Faerie Queene, which is effectively an extended hymn of praise to the queen, and Philip Sidney's Arcadia.    This courtly trend can also be seen in Spenser's Shepheardes Calender. This poem marks the introduction into an English context of the classical pastoral, a mode of poetry that assumes an aristocratic audience with a certain kind of attitude to the land and peasants. The explorations of love found in the sonnets of William Shakespeare and the poetry of Walter Raleigh and others also implies a courtly audience.Elizabethan verse drama is widely considered to be one of the major achievements of literature in English, and its most famous exponent, William Shakespeare, is revered as the greatest poet in the language. This drama, which served both as courtly masque and popular entertainment, deals with all the major themes of contemporary literature and life.
   There are plays on European, classical, and religious themes reflecting the importance of humanism and the Reformation. There are also a number of plays dealing with English history that may be read as part of an effort to strengthen the British national myth and as artistic underpinnings for Elizabeth's resistance to the Spanish and other foreign threats. A number of the comic works for the stage also use bucolic themes connected with the pastoral genre.
   In addition to Shakespeare, other notable dramatists of the period include Christopher Marlowe, Thomas Middleton, Thomas Dekker and Ben Jonson.


Literature:

   The Elizabethan era saw a great flourishing of literature, especially in the field of drama. The Italian Renaissance had rediscovered the ancient Greek and Roman theatre, and this was instrumental in the development of the new drama, which was then beginning to evolve apart from the old mystery and miracle plays of the Middle Ages. The Italians were particularly inspired by Seneca (a major tragic playwright and philosopher, the tutor of Nero) and Plautus (its comic clichés, especially that of the boasting soldier had a powerful influence on the Renaissance and after). However, the Italian tragedies embraced a principle contrary to Seneca's ethics: showing blood and violence on the stage. In Seneca's plays such scenes were only acted by the characters. But the English playwrights were intrigued by Italian model: a conspicuous community of Italian actors had settled in London and Giovanni Florio had brought much of the Italian language and culture to England. It is also true that the Elizabethan Era was a very violent age and that the high incidence of political assassinations in Renaissance Italy (embodied by Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince) did little to calm fears of popish plots. As a result, representing that kind of violence on the stage was probably more cathartic for the Elizabethan spectator. Following earlier Elizabethan plays such as Gorboduc by Sackville & Norton and The Spanish Tragedy by Kyd that was to provide much material for Hamlet, William Shakespeare stands out in this period as a poet and playwright as yet unsurpassed. Shakespeare was not a man of letters by profession, and probably had only some grammar school education. He was neither a lawyer, nor an aristocrat as the "university wits" that had monopolised the English stage when he started writing. But he was very gifted and incredibly versatile, and he surpassed "professionals" as Robert Greene who mocked this "shake-scene" of low origins. Though most dramas met with great success, it is in his later years (marked by the early reign of James I) that he wrote what have been considered his greatest plays: Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, Antony and Cleopatra, and The Tempest, a tragicomedy that inscribes within the main drama a brilliant pageant to the new king. Shakespeare also popularized the English sonnet which made significant changes to Petrarch's model.
   The sonnet was introduced into English by Thomas Wyatt in the early 16th century. Poems intended to be set to music as songs, such as by Thomas Campion, became popular as printed literature was disseminated more widely in households. See English Madrigal School. Other important figures in Elizabethan theatre include Christopher Marlowe, Thomas Dekker, John Fletcher and Francis Beaumont. Had Marlowe (1564-1593) not been stabbed at twenty-nine in a tavern brawl, says Anthony Burgess, he might have rivalled, if not equalled Shakespeare himself for his poetic gifts. Remarkably, he was born only a few weeks before Shakespeare and must have known him well. Marlowe's subject matter, though, is different: it focuses more on the moral drama of the renaissance man than any other thing. Marlowe was fascinated and terrified by the new frontiers opened by modern science. Drawing on German lore, he introduced Dr. Faustus to England, a scientist and magician who is obsessed by the thirst of knowledge and the desire to push man's technological power to its limits. He acquires supernatural gifts that even allow him to go back in time and wed Helen of Troy, but at the end of his twenty-four years' covenant with the devil he has to surrender his soul to him. His dark heroes may have something of Marlowe himself, whose untimely death remains a mystery. He was known for being an atheist, leading a lawless life, keeping many mistresses, consorting with ruffians: living the 'high life' of London's underworld. But many suspect that this might have been a cover-up for his activities as a secret agent for Elizabeth I, hinting that the 'accidental stabbing' might have been a premeditated assassination by the enemies of The Crown. Beaumont and Fletcher are less-known, but it is almost sure that they helped Shakespeare write some of his best dramas, and were quite popular at the time. It is also at this time that the city comedy genre develops. In the later 16th century English poetry was characterised by elaboration of language and extensive allusion to classical myths. The most important poets of this era include Edmund Spenser and Sir Philip Sidney. Elizabeth herself, a product of Renaissance humanism, produced occasional poems such as On Monsieur’s Departure.

Music:

Queen Elizabeth I fancied music and also knew well how to play instruments. She could play the lute and virginal, a small form of a harpsichord. It was essential to understand the art of music.Queen Elizabeth encouraged composers and musicians, employing over seventy musicians and singers. In court life you were expected to be able to dance and play. Dancing was considered part of propriety by Queen Elizabeth.

Architecture:

   Renaissance architecture arrived in England during the reign of Elizabeth I, having first spread through the Low countries where among other features it acquired versions of the Dutch gable, and Flemish strapwork in geometric designs adorning the walls. Both of these features can be seen on the towers of Wollaton Hall and again at Montacute House. It was also at this time that English houses adopted the Italian concept of a long gallery being the chief reception room.[1] In England, the Renaissance tended to manifest itself in large square tall houses such as Longleat House. Often these buildings had symmetrical towers which hint at the evolution from medieval fortified architecture.
   Hatfield House, built in its entirety by Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury, between 1607 and 1611, is a perfect example of the transition period from the gabled turreted style of the previous era. One can clearly see the turreted Tudor style wings at each end with their mullioned windows, however, the whole is achieving a symmetry and the two wings are linked by an Italianate Renaissance facade. This central facade, originally an open loggia, has been attributed to Inigo Jones himself, however, the central porch carries a heavier Jacobean influence than Jones would have used, so the attribution is probably false. Inside the house, the elaborately carved staircase demonstrates the Italian renaissance impression on English ornament.
   During the reigns of Henry VIII and Edward VI, many Italian artists came over who carried out various decorative features at Hampton Court, Layer Marney Tower, Essex (1522-1525), Sutton Place, Surrey (1529), Nonsuch Palace, and elsewhere. Later in the century, Flemish craftsmen succeeded the Italians, and the Royal Exchange in London (1566-1570) is one of the first important buildings designed by Henri de Paschen, an architect from Antwerp.



The Virgin Queen

Elizabeth Tudor is considered by many to be the greatest monarch in English history. When she became queen in 1558, she was twenty-five years old, a survivor of scandal and danger, and considered illegitimate by most Europeans. She inherited a bankrupt nation, torn by religious discord, a weakened pawn between the great powers of France and Spain. She was only the third queen to rule England in her own right; the other two examples, her cousin Lady Jane Grey and half-sister Mary I, were disastrous. Even her supporters believed her position dangerous and uncertain. Her only hope, they counseled, was to marry quickly and lean upon her husband for support. But Elizabeth had other ideas. 
She ruled alone for nearly half a century, lending her name to a glorious epoch in world history. She dazzled even her greatest enemies. Her sense of duty was admirable, though it came at great personal cost. She was committed above all else to preserving English peace and stability; her genuine love for her subjects was legendary. Only a few years after her death in 1603, they lamented her passing. In her greatest speech to Parliament, she told them, 'I count the glory of my crown that I have reigned with your love.' And five centuries later, the worldwide love affair with Elizabeth Tudor continues.

quinta-feira, 19 de março de 2009

Summary of first class

 In this essay it is put the question of why do students have poor essay grads.It is given the arguments of the students being unable to present an argument based on facts.The student must have the hability to persuade others into accepting and emvracing he´s opinion and for that, he needs to master the out of retoric. It is also required the subject knowledge,in order to provide on argument and explore it properly,not using the same arguments preciceusly presented.The art of retorial is also required, so the student can present a contenious issue.